What it takes to win a Nobel

President Obama 'orders Pakistan drone attacks'

January 23, 2009 – Missiles fired from suspected US drones killed at least 15 people inside Pakistan today, the first such strikes since Barack Obama became president and a clear sign that the controversial military policy begun by George W Bush has not changed.

Security officials said the strikes, which saw up to five missiles slam into houses in separate villages, killed seven "foreigners" – a term that usually means al-Qaeda – but locals also said that three children lost their lives.

————

US air-raid kills over 100 civilians in Farah

May 5, 2009 – Residents of the Bala Boluk district in western Farah province on Tuesday claimed more than one hundred 'innocent people' have been killed in the Monday's air offensive by the US forces. […]

Following the militant attack, locals say, the American forces bombarded Grani village, inflecting huge casualties to non-combatants.

Dr Atiqullah, a resident of the village, told Pajhwok Afghan News the bombardment destroyed the whole village and some of the mutilated bodies were beyond recognition.

He said they had so far retrieved 123 dead bodies from beneath the debris of the destroyed homes by using tractors.

————

Obama warns Iran: 'come clean' on nukes

September 25, 2009 – Backed by other world powers, U.S. President Barack Obama declared Friday that Iran is speeding down a path to confrontation and demanded that Tehran quickly "come clean" on all nuclear efforts and open a newly revealed secret site for close international inspection. He said he would not rule out military action if the Iranians refuse. […]

"Iran is on notice that when we meet with them on Oct 1 they are going to have to come clean and they are going to have to make a choice" between international isolation and giving up any aspirations to becoming a nuclear power, he said. If they refuse to give ground, they will stay on "a path that is going to lead to confrontation."

————

Nobel prize win 'humbles' Obama

October 9, 2009 – US President Barack Obama has said he was "surprised and deeply humbled" to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, less than 10 months into his presidency. […]

"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the Norwegian committee said in a statement. "His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population."

————

Obama's acceptance speech:

I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.

Now, these challenges can't be met by any one leader or any one nation. And that's why my administration's worked to establish a new era of engagement in which all nations must take responsibility for the world we seek. We cannot tolerate a world in which nuclear weapons spread to more nations and in which the terror of a nuclear holocaust endangers more people.

No, really: Barack Obama just used his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech to reiterate his threats against Iran.

UPDATE: Best headline so far: "Some Analysts Warn Obama's Nobel Peace Prize Complicates War Efforts".

QUIETUS RIOT: The Nobel committee issued a clarification explaining that Obama was actually awarded the "Rest In Peace Prize", in recognition of becoming the most prolific active killer on the planet and thereby ushering so many human beings beyond this vale of tears.  "By helping thousands of men, women, and children achieve ultimate peace, and showing every sign that he intends to do the same for thousands more, Barack Obama has truly earned this prestigious award."

SECOND-BEST HEADLINE: "Nobel List: Carter, Gore, Obama . . . No Clinton" (here).  Aww, poor Bill.  This genuinely is a bit of a mystery, though; I'd love to believe that the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis through sanctions disqualified him, but high body counts clearly don't deter these Norwegian nincompoops.

14 thoughts on “What it takes to win a Nobel”

  1. “No, really: Barack Obama just used his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech to reiterate his threats against Iran.”
    Well of course, you silly. What else would you use it for?
    Tom Lehrer: “Satire became obsolete the day Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.”
    No, I don’t think Obama is as bad as Kissinger (few are), but he has time, yet.

    Like

  2. The best part about Kissinger’s Nobel is that it was supposed to be awarded jointly to Le Duc Tho, but he refused it because there still wasn’t peace in Vietnam. Our politicians aren’t deterred by such trivial details.

    Like

  3. Just came back by to check to see if I had lost my mind–all the so-called Lefties seem to love it–I’m not insane, am I? Am I asleep? REALLy high??Please let me know!

    Like

  4. No, you’re not insane or asleep. Whether you’re high or not is something I can’t tell.
    But if you’re feeling utterly disgusted and demoralised, then you’re doing fine.

    Like

  5. Whew! good. Now, maybe I’ll get high to forget how my grandmother’s homeland betrayed the cause of peace…

    Like

  6. And another thing (lol–I am angry)
    If Norway (god love them) is so crazy about how Obama is “leading the world”, perhaps they would like to give up their considerable social safety net and pay for this fricking war on the world so that people here wont have to die in the streets from a lack of health,care, housing and food…there…feel better.

    Like

Comments are closed.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started