« Blame California! | Main | Why we're doomed »

Thursday, March 12, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834200af253ef011168eff7b1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Well, that's deeply reassuring:

Comments

What does "pre-emptive" actually mean?

It means that if you hadn't attacked, you'd have been attacked. There's at least some legal basis for this, assuming that the threat is real (so for example, Iran could justify preemptive warfare against Israel if they had evidence of an impending attack).

But the term that actually fits what the United States has claimed to be doing is preventive war, which is war that's launched to counter some alleged future threat (in the case of Iraq, one so vague and insubstantial that it doesn't pass the laugh test). And there's no basis for preventive war in international law. So the use of the term "preemptive" is just propaganda that's meant to oversell the danger.

Personally I never bother correcting official misusages of "preemptive war" because I think most people wouldn't notice the difference (and if they did, I think "preventive war" sounds more justifiable—basically I think that on a casual listen the terms sound like their definitions would be reversed).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment